Median Propagation
—ms
relay vs P2P reach-time (not win rate) · P2P —
▬ relay vs ▬ P2P · relative reach time
7.6× faster
Coverage p75 · reach time
—ms
relay p75 first-to-last · P2P p75 —
4 regions · all reached within p75
8.1× tighter
Compact payload / forward
—KB
one compact+FEC forward · full block —
Per recipient. The relay overlays native P2P (fanout × FEC), so total relay bandwidth is higher — it trades bandwidth for latency, not bandwidth saved.
▬ one forward vs ▬ full block · relative payload
—
Lead vs Public Explorer
−2.4s
Relay observers see blocks first, before zcashexplorer
rolling explorer delta
Propagation Latency · Last 40 Blocks
Relay holds flat and low. P2P runs high and ragged.
▬ relay · avg — ms
▬ p2p · avg — ms
Payload per forward
One compact+FEC forward vs a full block
Per recipient. The relay overlays native P2P and fans this payload out with FEC parity, so total relay bandwidth is higher — it buys lower latency, it does not save bandwidth.
ZCASH P2P · full block1.84 MB
full serialized block + getdata round-trips
RELAY · compact + FEC14.2 KB
short IDs · prefilled coinbase · 32 parity shards
0
round-trips to read · by design